An honest look at what it takes to build a finance-grade AI in-house, versus buying nummera. Including when building is the right call.
Higher is better. Ratings reflect the typical outcome for a mid-market finance team, not the theoretical ceiling.
| Dimension | Build in-houseYour team builds it | General-purpose AIChatGPT / Copilot + your data | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first valueWeeks, or quarters | |||
| Finance domain depthClose, variance, reporting | |||
| Accuracy & hallucination controlFigures checked against source | |||
| Live data integrationsFabric, Dynamics, SharePoint, ledgers | |||
| Runs on your own infrastructureAzure, GCP, AWS, on-prem | |||
| Auditability & sign-offTrail from raw data to board pack | |||
| Keeping pace with AIMaintenance as models change | |||
| Cost & effort to ownTotal cost of ownership | |||
| Control & customizationShape it to your exact process | |||
| Specialist talent requiredLess is better | |||
| Best when | AI is your core product, and you have the team to own it. | Quick, low-stakes drafting where mistakes are cheap. | You want finance outcomes now, on your own infrastructure. |
Illustrative ratings for a typical mid-market finance team. Your mileage will vary with scope and in-house capability.
AI in finance is genuinely your competitive edge, and you are willing to fund it like a product.
You want better finance outcomes now, and AI is a capability you use, not a product you sell.
nummera runs on your own infrastructure, verifies every figure, and is live in weeks. See it on your numbers.